Re: [PATCH] drivers: md: Unify common definitions of raid1 and raid10

From: Song Liu
Date: Thu May 16 2019 - 11:41:43 EST


On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:24 AM Marcos Paulo de Souza
<marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ping.
>

Thanks for the patch. I will process it after the merge window closes.

Song

> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 08:18:49AM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > These definitions are being moved to raid1-10.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/raid1-10.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/md/raid1.c | 29 ++---------------------------
> > drivers/md/raid10.c | 27 +--------------------------
> > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> > index 400001b815db..7d968bf08e54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,31 @@
> > #define RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE (64*1024)
> > #define RESYNC_PAGES ((RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE-1) / PAGE_SIZE)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Number of guaranteed raid bios in case of extreme VM load:
> > + */
> > +#define NR_RAID_BIOS 256
> > +
> > +/* when we get a read error on a read-only array, we redirect to another
> > + * device without failing the first device, or trying to over-write to
> > + * correct the read error. To keep track of bad blocks on a per-bio
> > + * level, we store IO_BLOCKED in the appropriate 'bios' pointer
> > + */
> > +#define IO_BLOCKED ((struct bio *)1)
> > +/* When we successfully write to a known bad-block, we need to remove the
> > + * bad-block marking which must be done from process context. So we record
> > + * the success by setting devs[n].bio to IO_MADE_GOOD
> > + */
> > +#define IO_MADE_GOOD ((struct bio *)2)
> > +
> > +#define BIO_SPECIAL(bio) ((unsigned long)bio <= 2)
> > +
> > +/* When there are this many requests queue to be written by
> > + * the raid thread, we become 'congested' to provide back-pressure
> > + * for writeback.
> > + */
> > +static int max_queued_requests = 1024;
> > +
> > /* for managing resync I/O pages */
> > struct resync_pages {
> > void *raid_bio;
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > index 0c8a098d220e..bb052c35bf29 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > @@ -50,31 +50,6 @@
> > (1L << MD_HAS_PPL) | \
> > (1L << MD_HAS_MULTIPLE_PPLS))
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Number of guaranteed r1bios in case of extreme VM load:
> > - */
> > -#define NR_RAID1_BIOS 256
> > -
> > -/* when we get a read error on a read-only array, we redirect to another
> > - * device without failing the first device, or trying to over-write to
> > - * correct the read error. To keep track of bad blocks on a per-bio
> > - * level, we store IO_BLOCKED in the appropriate 'bios' pointer
> > - */
> > -#define IO_BLOCKED ((struct bio *)1)
> > -/* When we successfully write to a known bad-block, we need to remove the
> > - * bad-block marking which must be done from process context. So we record
> > - * the success by setting devs[n].bio to IO_MADE_GOOD
> > - */
> > -#define IO_MADE_GOOD ((struct bio *)2)
> > -
> > -#define BIO_SPECIAL(bio) ((unsigned long)bio <= 2)
> > -
> > -/* When there are this many requests queue to be written by
> > - * the raid1 thread, we become 'congested' to provide back-pressure
> > - * for writeback.
> > - */
> > -static int max_queued_requests = 1024;
> > -
> > static void allow_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr);
> > static void lower_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr);
> >
> > @@ -2955,7 +2930,7 @@ static struct r1conf *setup_conf(struct mddev *mddev)
> > if (!conf->poolinfo)
> > goto abort;
> > conf->poolinfo->raid_disks = mddev->raid_disks * 2;
> > - err = mempool_init(&conf->r1bio_pool, NR_RAID1_BIOS, r1bio_pool_alloc,
> > + err = mempool_init(&conf->r1bio_pool, NR_RAID_BIOS, r1bio_pool_alloc,
> > r1bio_pool_free, conf->poolinfo);
> > if (err)
> > goto abort;
> > @@ -3240,7 +3215,7 @@ static int raid1_reshape(struct mddev *mddev)
> > newpoolinfo->mddev = mddev;
> > newpoolinfo->raid_disks = raid_disks * 2;
> >
> > - ret = mempool_init(&newpool, NR_RAID1_BIOS, r1bio_pool_alloc,
> > + ret = mempool_init(&newpool, NR_RAID_BIOS, r1bio_pool_alloc,
> > r1bio_pool_free, newpoolinfo);
> > if (ret) {
> > kfree(newpoolinfo);
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > index 3b6880dd648d..24cb116d950f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > @@ -73,31 +73,6 @@
> > * [B A] [D C] [B A] [E C D]
> > */
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Number of guaranteed r10bios in case of extreme VM load:
> > - */
> > -#define NR_RAID10_BIOS 256
> > -
> > -/* when we get a read error on a read-only array, we redirect to another
> > - * device without failing the first device, or trying to over-write to
> > - * correct the read error. To keep track of bad blocks on a per-bio
> > - * level, we store IO_BLOCKED in the appropriate 'bios' pointer
> > - */
> > -#define IO_BLOCKED ((struct bio *)1)
> > -/* When we successfully write to a known bad-block, we need to remove the
> > - * bad-block marking which must be done from process context. So we record
> > - * the success by setting devs[n].bio to IO_MADE_GOOD
> > - */
> > -#define IO_MADE_GOOD ((struct bio *)2)
> > -
> > -#define BIO_SPECIAL(bio) ((unsigned long)bio <= 2)
> > -
> > -/* When there are this many requests queued to be written by
> > - * the raid10 thread, we become 'congested' to provide back-pressure
> > - * for writeback.
> > - */
> > -static int max_queued_requests = 1024;
> > -
> > static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf);
> > static void lower_barrier(struct r10conf *conf);
> > static int _enough(struct r10conf *conf, int previous, int ignore);
> > @@ -3684,7 +3659,7 @@ static struct r10conf *setup_conf(struct mddev *mddev)
> >
> > conf->geo = geo;
> > conf->copies = copies;
> > - err = mempool_init(&conf->r10bio_pool, NR_RAID10_BIOS, r10bio_pool_alloc,
> > + err = mempool_init(&conf->r10bio_pool, NR_RAID_BIOS, r10bio_pool_alloc,
> > r10bio_pool_free, conf);
> > if (err)
> > goto out;
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Marcos