Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/doc: Allow new UAPI to be used once it's in drm-next/drm-misc-next.

[Eric Anholt]

Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:06:38PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I was trying to figure out if it was permissible to merge the Mesa
>> side of V3D's CSD support yet while it's in drm-misc-next but not
>> drm-next, and developers on #dri-devel IRC had differing opinions of
>> what the requirement was.
>> 
>> v2: Restrict to just drm-next or drm-misc-next on airlied's request.
>
> Personally I think that's a bit too strict (if people want to screw up,
> they will be able to anyway). But since I'm all for clearer rules where
> possible, this has my support too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>

Pushed to drm-misc-next now.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature