Re: [PATCH 0/4] uapi, vfs: Change the mount API UAPI [ver #2]
From: Christian Brauner
Date: Fri May 17 2019 - 03:29:30 EST
On May 17, 2019 9:13:26 AM GMT+02:00, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If you still prefer to have cloexec flags
>> for the 4 new syscalls then yes,
>> if they could at least all have the same name
>> (FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC?) that would be good.
>
>They don't all have the same value (see OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC).
>
>Note that I also don't want to blindly #define them to O_CLOEXEC
>because it's
>not necessarily the same value on all arches. Currently it can be
>02000000,
>010000000 or 0x400000 for instance, which means that if it's sharing a
>mask
>with other flags, at least three bits have to be reserved for it or we
>have to
>have arch-dependent bit juggling.
Ugh. Right, I forgot about that entirely.
Christian
>
>One thing I like about your approach of just making them O_CLOEXEC by
>default
>and removing the constants is that it avoids this mess entirely.
>
>David