Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] dt-bindings: backlight: add lm3630a bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:25 AM Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add new backlight bindings for the TI LM3630A dual-string white LED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v5:
> - Change 'lm3630a_bl@38' in examples to 'led-controller@38'
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Drop $ref from led-sources
> - Drop description from reg of i2c address
> - Expand description of reg for the control bank
> - Drop status from examples
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Add label. I didn't add a description for it since that'll come from
>   the common properties once its converted.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Update description of max-brightness
> - Add description for reg
> - Correct typo: s/tranisiton/transition
> - add reg to control banks
> - add additionalProperties
>
>  .../leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.yaml     | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 129 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.yaml

I'm working on getting the examples to be validated by the schema (in
addition to just building with dtc) and there's a couple of errors:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
'#address-cells', '#size-cells' do not match any of the regexes:
'^led@[01]$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
'#address-cells', '#size-cells' do not match any of the regexes:
'^led@[01]$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

You didn't list '#address-cells' and '#size-cells'.

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
led@0: 'ti,linear-mapping-mode' does not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
led@1: 'ti,linear-mapping-mode' does not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

'ti,linear-mapping-mode' is not defined in the child nodes.

Rob