Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 17 May 2019 21:09:21 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> By the way, how do you all feel about moving this as a generic
> facility to zero out the suffix/prefix of an structure? In particular,
> since we won't have the LAT* stuff according to Steven.

Is this done in other places? If so, how many.

Note, the LAT* update doesn't belong in the iterator reset function,
but the pos = -1 still does.

Thanks!

-- Steve