Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] clk: at91: sckc: add support to specify registers bit offsets

[Claudiu.Beznea]

On 18.05.2019 00:13, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> External E-Mail
> 
> 
> On 16/05/2019 08:10:34+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> @@ -69,10 +80,11 @@ static int clk_slow_osc_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>>>  	void __iomem *sckcr = osc->sckcr;
>>>>  	u32 tmp = readl(sckcr);
>>>>  
>>>> -	if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP | AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN))
>>>> +	if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(osc->bits) |
>>>> +		   AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(osc->bits)))
>>>
>>> I still find that:
>>>
>>> 	if (tmp & (osc->bits->cr_osc32byp | osc->bits->cr_osc32en))
>>>
>>> would be shorter and easier to read and still fits on one line.
>>
>> Agree, but I thought to use the same interface everywhere. Anyway, tell me
>> if you want to resend with these changes.
>>
> My comment applies to all the AT91_SCKC_.*() macros. I don't feel that
> the macros make the code clearer, accessing bits->cr_.* is self
> documenting enough (and makes the code shorter).

OK, I'll send a new version taking this into consideration.

>