[PATCH 4.14 08/63] objtool: Fix function fallthrough detection

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit e6f393bc939d566ce3def71232d8013de9aaadde upstream.

When a function falls through to the next function due to a compiler
bug, objtool prints some obscure warnings.  For example:

  drivers/regulator/core.o: warning: objtool: regulator_count_voltages()+0x95: return with modified stack frame
  drivers/regulator/core.o: warning: objtool: regulator_count_voltages()+0x0: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+32 cfa2=7+8

Instead it should be printing:

  drivers/regulator/core.o: warning: objtool: regulator_supply_is_couple() falls through to next function regulator_count_voltages()

This used to work, but was broken by the following commit:

  13810435b9a7 ("objtool: Support GCC 8's cold subfunctions")

The padding nops at the end of a function aren't actually part of the
function, as defined by the symbol table.  So the 'func' variable in
validate_branch() is getting cleared to NULL when a padding nop is
encountered, breaking the fallthrough detection.

If the current instruction doesn't have a function associated with it,
just consider it to be part of the previously detected function by not
overwriting the previous value of 'func'.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 13810435b9a7 ("objtool: Support GCC 8's cold subfunctions")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/546d143820cd08a46624ae8440d093dd6c902cae.1557766718.git.jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 tools/objtool/check.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1779,7 +1779,8 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
 			return 1;
 		}
 
-		func = insn->func ? insn->func->pfunc : NULL;
+		if (insn->func)
+			func = insn->func->pfunc;
 
 		if (func && insn->ignore) {
 			WARN_FUNC("BUG: why am I validating an ignored function?",