Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] drivers/soc: xdma: Add PCI device configuration sysfs
From: Andrew Jeffery
Date: Mon May 20 2019 - 23:24:49 EST
On Tue, 21 May 2019, at 05:51, Eddie James wrote:
> The AST2500 has two PCI devices embedded. The XDMA engine can use either
> device to perform DMA transfers. Users need the capability to choose
> which device to use. This commit therefore adds two sysfs files that
> toggle the AST2500 and XDMA engine between the two PCI devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-xdma.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-xdma.c
> b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-xdma.c
> index 2162ca0..002b571 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-xdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-xdma.c
> @@ -667,6 +667,64 @@ static void aspeed_xdma_free_vga_blks(struct
> aspeed_xdma *ctx)
> }
> }
>
> +static int aspeed_xdma_change_pcie_conf(struct aspeed_xdma *ctx, u32 conf)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->start_lock);
> + rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ctx->wait,
> + !test_bit(XDMA_IN_PRG,
> + &ctx->flags),
> + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->start_lock);
> + return -EINTR;
> + }
> +
> + /* previous op didn't complete, wake up waiters anyway */
> + if (!rc)
> + wake_up_interruptible_all(&ctx->wait);
> +
> + reset_control_assert(ctx->reset);
> + msleep(10);
> +
> + aspeed_scu_pcie_write(ctx, conf);
> + msleep(10);
> +
> + reset_control_deassert(ctx->reset);
> + msleep(10);
> +
> + aspeed_xdma_init_eng(ctx);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->start_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t aspeed_xdma_use_bmc(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + struct aspeed_xdma *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + rc = aspeed_xdma_change_pcie_conf(ctx, aspeed_xdma_bmc_pcie_conf);
> + return rc ?: count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(use_bmc, 0200, NULL, aspeed_xdma_use_bmc);
> +
> +static ssize_t aspeed_xdma_use_vga(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + struct aspeed_xdma *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + rc = aspeed_xdma_change_pcie_conf(ctx, aspeed_xdma_vga_pcie_conf);
> + return rc ?: count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(use_vga, 0200, NULL, aspeed_xdma_use_vga);
> +
> static int aspeed_xdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int irq;
> @@ -745,6 +803,9 @@ static int aspeed_xdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return rc;
> }
>
> + device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_use_bmc);
> + device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_use_vga);
Two attributes is a broken approach IMO. This gives the false representation of 4
states (neither, vga, bmc, both) when really there are only two (vga and bmc). I
think we should have one attribute that reacts to "vga" and "bmc" writes.
Andrew
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -752,6 +813,9 @@ static int aspeed_xdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct aspeed_xdma *ctx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + device_remove_file(ctx->dev, &dev_attr_use_vga);
> + device_remove_file(ctx->dev, &dev_attr_use_bmc);
> +
> misc_deregister(&ctx->misc);
>
> aspeed_xdma_free_vga_blks(ctx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>