Re: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Don't runtime suspend when device only supports wakeup from D0

[Kai Heng Feng]

> On May 22, 2019, at 9:48 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:42:14AM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
>> at 6:23 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:31:04AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>>> There's an xHC device that doesn't wake when a USB device gets plugged
>>>> to its USB port. The driver's own runtime suspend callback was called,
>>>> PME signaling was enabled, but it stays at PCI D0.
>>> 
>>> This looks like it's fixing a bug?  If so, please include a link to
>>> the bug report, and make sure the bug report has "lspci -vv" output
>>> attached to it.
> 
> I see your bug report (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203673)
> but it doesn't say anything about what this looks like to a user.
> Presumably somebody complained about something not working.  The bug
> report should include that information about what isn't working.
> Ideally, a user experiencing a problem should be able to google for
> the symptoms and find the bug report.

Sorry about that. Iâve added a comment to describe the symptom.

> 
>>>> A PCI device can be runtime suspended to D0 when it supports D0 PME and
>>>> its _S0W reports D0. Theoratically this should work, but as [1]
>>>> specifies, D0 doesn't have wakeup capability.
>>> 
>>> What does "runtime suspended to D0" mean?
> 
> If I understand correctly, Linux normally clears PME-Enable while
> devices are in D0, but sets PME-Enable if a device is "runtime
> suspended to D0â.

Yes, this is what happens here.

> 
> I'm not sure I'd describe that as "suspended", since the power
> management state is exactly D0 and the only difference is that a PME
> interrupt is enabled.  It sounds to me like the xHCI controller is
> basically using PME as a hotplug interrupt to say "something happened
> on my secondary (USB) interface".  But that's more a question for
> Rafael.

Runtime suspend routines are called successfully, so I think itâs still logically suspended.

> 
> And I guess this patch basically means we wouldn't call the driver's
> suspend callback if we're merely going to stay at D0, so the driver
> would have no idea anything happened.  That might match
> Documentation/power/pci.txt better, because it suggests that the
> suspend callback is related to putting a device in a low-power state,
> and D0 is not a low-power state.

Yes, the patch is to let the device stay at D0 and donât run driverâs own runtime suspend routine.

I guess Iâll just proceed to send a V2 with updated commit message?

Kai-Heng

> 
> Maybe we should also update Documentation/power/pci.txt to say "PCI
> devices ... can be programmed to generate PMEs while in any state
> (D0-D3)" instead of "a low-power state (D1-D3)â.
> 
> Anyway, this is all Rafael's area, so I'll defer to him.
> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 5 +++++
>>>> drivers/pci/pci.c        | 2 +-
>>>> include/linux/pci.h      | 3 +++
>>>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>> index cae630fe6387..15a6310c5d7b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>> @@ -1251,6 +1251,11 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_suspend(struct
>>>> device *dev)
>>>> 		return 0;
>>>> 	}
>>>> 
>>>> +	if (pci_target_state(pci_dev, device_can_wakeup(dev)) == PCI_D0) {
>>>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "D0 doesn't have wakeup capability\n");
>>>> +		return -EBUSY;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> 	pci_dev->state_saved = false;
>>>> 	if (pm && pm->runtime_suspend) {
>>>> 		error = pm->runtime_suspend(dev);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>> index 8abc843b1615..ceee6efbbcfe 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>> @@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_wake_from_d3);
>>>>  * If the platform can't manage @dev, return the deepest state from which it
>>>>  * can generate wake events, based on any available PME info.
>>>>  */
>>>> -static pci_power_t pci_target_state(struct pci_dev *dev, bool wakeup)
>>>> +pci_power_t pci_target_state(struct pci_dev *dev, bool wakeup)
>>>> {
>>>> 	pci_power_t target_state = PCI_D3hot;
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> index 4a5a84d7bdd4..91e8dc4d04aa 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> @@ -1188,6 +1188,7 @@ bool pci_pme_capable(struct pci_dev *dev,
>>>> pci_power_t state);
>>>> void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
>>>> int pci_enable_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state, bool enable);
>>>> int pci_wake_from_d3(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
>>>> +pci_power_t pci_target_state(struct pci_dev *dev, bool wakeup);
>>>> int pci_prepare_to_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>>> int pci_back_from_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>>> bool pci_dev_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>>> @@ -1672,6 +1673,8 @@ static inline int pci_set_power_state(struct
>>>> pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
>>>> { return 0; }
>>>> static inline int pci_wake_from_d3(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
>>>> { return 0; }
>>>> +pci_power_t pci_target_state(struct pci_dev *dev, bool wakeup)
>>>> +{ return PCI_D0; }
>>>> static inline pci_power_t pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *dev,
>>>> 					   pm_message_t state)
>>>> { return PCI_D0; }
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.17.1
>> 
>>