Hi Enric,
Am Montag, 20. Mai 2019, 15:38:32 CEST schrieb Enric Balletbo Serra:
Hi all,It needs to go after the clk_enable calls.
As pointed by [1] and [2] this commit, that now is upstream, breaks
veyron (rk3288) and kevin (rk3399) boards. The problem is especially
critical for veyron boards because they don't boot anymore.
I didn't look deep at the problem but I have some concerns about this
patch, see below.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rockchip/msg24657.html
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rockchip/msg24735.html
Missatge de Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> del dia dt., 30
dâabr. 2019 a les 15:39:
On 30/04/2019 12:09, Elaine Zhang wrote:That's the line that causes the hang. Commenting this makes the veyron
Explicitly use the pinctrl to set/unset the right modeReviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
instead of relying on the pinctrl init mode.
And it requires setting the tshut polarity before select pinctrl.
When the temperature sensor mode is set to 0, it will automatically
reset the board via the Clock-Reset-Unit (CRU) if the over temperature
threshold is reached. However, when the pinctrl initializes, it does a
transition to "otp_out" which may lead the SoC restart all the time.
"otp_out" IO may be connected to the RESET circuit on the hardware.
If the IO is in the wrong state, it will trigger RESET.
(similar to the effect of pressing the RESET button)
which will cause the soc to restart all the time.
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index 9c7643d62ed7..6dc7fc516abf 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
int tshut_temp;
enum tshut_mode tshut_mode;
enum tshut_polarity tshut_polarity;
+ struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
+ struct pinctrl_state *gpio_state;
+ struct pinctrl_state *otp_state;
};
/**
@@ -1242,6 +1245,8 @@ static int rockchip_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return error;
}
+ thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, false);
+
boot again. Probably this needs to go after chip->initialize?
At this point the tsadc may still be unclocked.
If need _backwards-compatible_, It's can't return PTR_ERR(thermal->pinctrl) when get
More importantly, it should be _backwards-compatible_, aka work withShouldn't this mode be documented properly in the binding first?error = clk_prepare_enable(thermal->clk);
if (error) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable converter clock: %d\n",
@@ -1267,6 +1272,30 @@ static int rockchip_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
thermal->chip->initialize(thermal->grf, thermal->regs,
thermal->tshut_polarity);
+ if (thermal->tshut_mode == TSHUT_MODE_GPIO) {
+ thermal->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(thermal->pinctrl)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find thermal pinctrl\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(thermal->pinctrl);
+ }
+
+ thermal->gpio_state = pinctrl_lookup_state(thermal->pinctrl,
+ "gpio");
old devicetrees without that property and not break thermal handling for
them entirely.
The binding [3] talks about init, default and sleep states but *not*I definitly agree here. Handling + checking the binding change
gpio and otpout. The patch series looks incomplete to me or not using
the proper names.
[3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.txt
Same here otpout is not a documented.+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(thermal->gpio_state)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find thermal gpio state\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ thermal->otp_state = pinctrl_lookup_state(thermal->pinctrl,
+ "otpout");
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(thermal->otp_state)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find thermal otpout state\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
As this change is now in mainline and is causing veyron to hang I'd
suggest reverting this change for now. Even fixing the root cause
(maybe the one I pointed above) after this patch we will have the
thermal driver to fail because "gpio" and "otpout" states are not
defined nor documented (a change on this will need some reviews and
acks and time I guess).
as well as needed fallback code is definitly not material for -rc-kernels
so we should just revert for now and let Elaine fix the issues for 5.3.
Anyone volunteering for sending a revert-patch to Eduardo? :-)
Heiko