Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable -Wsometimes-uninitialized

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:46:44AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Ah, I thought they were all fixed, as I don't see any remaining warnings
> in my tree. It seems that I never send this workaround for
> DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
> index 5f3efabc36f4..cbe1ea0fce84 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wait.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wait.h
> @@ -68,8 +68,15 @@ extern void __init_waitqueue_head(struct
> wait_queue_head *wq_head, const char *n
>         } while (0)
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> -# define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) \
> -       ({ init_waitqueue_head(&name); name; })
> +# define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) {
>                  \
> +       .lock           = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock),
>          \
> +       .head           = ({
>          \
> +               static struct lock_class_key __key;
>          \
> +               lockdep_set_class_and_name(&(name).lock, &__key, #
> name);       \
> +               (struct list_head){ &(name).head, &(name).head };
>          \
> +       }),
>          \
> +}
> +
>  # define DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(name) \
>         struct wait_queue_head name = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name)
>  #else
> 
> Are there any others you see?
> 
>       Arnd

Hi Arnd,

Were you planning on sending this out for review? It would be nice to
get these fixed so we can get this warning enabled.

I am bumping the other patches/inquiries I have sent now.

Cheers,
Nathan