Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test for s390x
From: Andrew Jones
Date: Thu May 23 2019 - 06:59:20 EST
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The test is an adaption of the same test for x86. Note that there
> are some differences in the way how s390x deals with the kvm_valid_regs
> in struct kvm_run, so some of the tests had to be removed. Also this
> test is not using the ucall() interface on s390x yet (which would need
> some work to be usable on s390x), so it simply drops out of the VM with
> a diag 0x501 breakpoint instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 514d1f88ee26..68f76ee9e821 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8645,6 +8645,7 @@ F: arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
> F: arch/s390/include/asm/kvm*
> F: arch/s390/kvm/
> F: arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> +F: tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/
> F: tools/testing/selftests/kvm/*/s390x/
Do we need these lines added? We have tools/testing/selftests/kvm/ in the
common KVM section already. If we do want to specify them specifically,
then I guess we need x86 and arm MAINTAINERS updates as well.
Thanks,
drew