Re: [PATCH] staging: most: usb: Remove variable frame_size

[Greg KH]

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:53:34PM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> Remove variable frame_size as its multiple usages are all independent of
> each other and so can be returned separately.
> Issue found with Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c | 16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c b/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c
> index 360cb5b7a10b..751e82cf66c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c
> @@ -186,32 +186,28 @@ static inline int start_sync_ep(struct usb_device *usb_dev, u16 ep)
>   */
>  static unsigned int get_stream_frame_size(struct most_channel_config *cfg)
>  {
> -	unsigned int frame_size = 0;
>  	unsigned int sub_size = cfg->subbuffer_size;
>  
>  	if (!sub_size) {
>  		pr_warn("Misconfig: Subbuffer size zero.\n");
> -		return frame_size;
> +		return 0;
>  	}
>  	switch (cfg->data_type) {
>  	case MOST_CH_ISOC:
> -		frame_size = AV_PACKETS_PER_XACT * sub_size;
> -		break;
> +		return AV_PACKETS_PER_XACT * sub_size;
>  	case MOST_CH_SYNC:
>  		if (cfg->packets_per_xact == 0) {
>  			pr_warn("Misconfig: Packets per XACT zero\n");
> -			frame_size = 0;
> +			return 0;
>  		} else if (cfg->packets_per_xact == 0xFF) {
> -			frame_size = (USB_MTU / sub_size) * sub_size;
> +			return (USB_MTU / sub_size) * sub_size;
>  		} else {
> -			frame_size = cfg->packets_per_xact * sub_size;
> +			return cfg->packets_per_xact * sub_size;
>  		}
> -		break;
>  	default:
>  		pr_warn("Query frame size of non-streaming channel\n");
> -		break;
> +		return 0;
>  	}
> -	return frame_size;
>  }

Now it just feels like you are doing "busy work" :(

frame_size makes sense here, right?  Why change this code?

Remember, code is written for developers first, the compiler second.
Reading this with frame_size makes it much more obvious what this code
does when you read it again in 5-10 years.  Why change this, you have
not made it faster, or smaller at all.

So no, I would not accept this, sorry.

We have so many _real_ things to do in the drivers/staging/ directory if
you are looking for stuff to clean up.  Don't try to micro-optimize
things that do not matter at the expense of understanding.

thanks,

greg k-h