Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Use HMM for ODP v4
From: Jason Gunthorpe
Date: Thu May 23 2019 - 15:50:29 EST
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 03:39:59PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 04:10:38PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:24:58PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > I can not take mmap_sem in range_register, the READ_ONCE is fine and
> > > they are no race as we do take a reference on the hmm struct thus
> >
> > Of course there are use after free races with a READ_ONCE scheme, I
> > shouldn't have to explain this.
>
> Well i can not think of anything again here the mm->hmm can not
> change while driver is calling hmm_range_register()
Oh of course! It is so confusing because the new code makes it look like
it could be changing...
> so if you want i can remove the READ_ONCE() this does not change
> anything.
Please just write it as:
/* The caller must hold a valid struct hmm_mirror to call this api,
* and a valid hmm_mirror guarantees mm->hmm is valid.
*/
range->hmm = mm->hmm;
kref_get(&range->hmm->kref);
All the READ_ONCE/kref_get_not_zero/!hmm just obfuscates the reality
that hmm is non-NULL and constant here or the caller is using the API
wrong.
kref_get will reliably oops or WARN_ON if it is misused which is a
fine amount of debugging.
Jason