Re: [REVIEW][PATCHv2 03/26] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL

[Eric W. Biederman]

Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:11:19AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> index ade32046f3fe..e45d5b440fb1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -256,7 +256,10 @@ void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, void __user *addr,
>>  			   const char *str)
>>  {
>>  	arm64_show_signal(signo, str);
>> -	force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
>> +	if (signo == SIGKILL)
>> +		force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
>> +	else
>> +		force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
>>  }
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
>
> Are you planning to send this series on, or would you like me to pick this
> into the arm64 tree?

I am planning on taking this through siginfo tree, unless it causes
problems.

The rest of my patchset this is a part of is a clean up to remove
the task pointer which is always current from all of the force_sig
calls.

Eric