Re: [PATCH v2] wlcore: sdio: Fix a memory leaking bug in wl1271_probe()
From: Jon Hunter
Date: Fri May 24 2019 - 05:31:43 EST
On 24/05/2019 03:43, Gen Zhang wrote:
> In wl1271_probe(), 'glue->core' is allocated by platform_device_alloc(),
> when this allocation fails, ENOMEM is returned. However, 'pdev_data'
> and 'glue' are allocated by devm_kzalloc() before 'glue->core'. When
> platform_device_alloc() returns NULL, we should also free 'pdev_data'
> and 'glue' before wl1271_probe() ends to prevent leaking memory.
No, devm_kzalloc() automatically frees memory on failure.
> Similarly, we should free 'pdev_data' when 'glue' is NULL. And we
> should free 'pdev_data' and 'glue' when 'ret' is error.
>
> Further, we shoulf free 'glue->dev', 'pdev_data' and 'glue' when this
> function normally ends to prevent memory leaking.
Why?
> Signed-off-by: Gen Zhang <blackgod016574@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
> index 4d4b0770..9110891 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
> @@ -298,8 +298,10 @@ static int wl1271_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> pdev_data->if_ops = &sdio_ops;
>
> glue = devm_kzalloc(&func->dev, sizeof(*glue), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!glue)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!glue) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free1;
> + }
>
> glue->dev = &func->dev;
>
> @@ -311,7 +313,7 @@ static int wl1271_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
>
> ret = wlcore_probe_of(&func->dev, &irq, &wakeirq, pdev_data);
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + goto out_free2;
>
> /* if sdio can keep power while host is suspended, enable wow */
> mmcflags = sdio_get_host_pm_caps(func);
> @@ -340,7 +342,7 @@ static int wl1271_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> if (!glue->core) {
> dev_err(glue->dev, "can't allocate platform_device");
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> + goto out_free2;
> }
>
> glue->core->dev.parent = &func->dev;
> @@ -380,12 +382,17 @@ static int wl1271_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> dev_err(glue->dev, "can't add platform device\n");
> goto out_dev_put;
> }
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
This is completely wrong.
> out_dev_put:
> platform_device_put(glue->core);
>
> -out:
> +out_free2:
> + devm_kfree(&func->dev, glue);
> +
> +out_free1:
> + devm_kfree(&func->dev, pdev_data);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> ---
Jon
--
nvpublic