[for-next][PATCH 02/16] x86/ftrace: Make enable parameter bool where applicable

[Steven Rostedt]

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

The code modification functions have an "enable" parameter that is an "int"
but used as a boolean. Switch its type to "bool" to remove the ambiguity
that "int" causes.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e1429923d9eda92a3cf5ee9e33c7eacce539781d.1558115654.git.naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Reported-by: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index 0927bb158ffc..ba37bcb7f92b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int add_brk_on_nop(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
 	return add_break(rec->ip, old);
 }
 
-static int add_breakpoints(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, int enable)
+static int add_breakpoints(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, bool enable)
 {
 	unsigned long ftrace_addr;
 	int ret;
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int add_update_nop(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
 	return add_update_code(ip, new);
 }
 
-static int add_update(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, int enable)
+static int add_update(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, bool enable)
 {
 	unsigned long ftrace_addr;
 	int ret;
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int finish_update_nop(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
 	return ftrace_write(ip, new, 1);
 }
 
-static int finish_update(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, int enable)
+static int finish_update(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, bool enable)
 {
 	unsigned long ftrace_addr;
 	int ret;
-- 
2.20.1