Re: [PATCH] xhci: clear port_remote_wakeup after resume failure
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Date: Mon May 27 2019 - 07:32:09 EST
Hi Matthias,
thanks for the review.
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 14:16 +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 24.5.2019 17.52, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > This was seen on a Dell Precision 5520 using it's WD15 dock. The dock's
> > Ethernet device interfaces with the laptop through one of it's USB3
> > ports. While idle, the Ethernet device and HCD are suspended by runtime
> > PM, being the only device connected on the bus. Then, both are resumed on
> > behalf of the Ethernet device, which has remote wake-up capabilities.
> >
> > The Ethernet device was observed to randomly disconnect from the USB
> > port shortly after submitting it's remote wake-up request. Probably a
> > weird timing issue yet to be investigated. This causes runtime PM to
> > busyloop causing some tangible CPU load. The reason is the port gets
> > stuck in the middle of a remote wake-up operation, waiting for the
> > device to switch to U0. This never happens, leaving "port_remote_wakeup"
> > enabled, and automatically triggering a failure on any further suspend
> > operation.
> >
> > This patch clears "port_remote_wakeup" upon detecting a device with a
> > wrong resuming port state (see Table 4-9 in 4.15.2.3). Making sure the
> > above mentioned situation doesn't trigger a PM busyloop.
> >
>
> There was a similar case where the USB3 link had transitioned to a
> lower power U1 or U2 state after resume, before driver read the state,
> leaving port_remote_wakeup flag uncleared.
>
> This was fixed in 5.1 kernel by commit:
>
> 6cbcf59 xhci: Fix port resume done detection for SS ports with LPM enable
>
> Can you check if you have it?
> It should be in recent stable releases as well.
I was aware of that patch, unfortunately it doesn't address the same issue. In
my case I never get a second port status event (so no PLC == 1 or any state
change seen in PLS). The device simply disconnects from the bus.
I did test both the issue and fix on top of last week's master branch.
Regards,
Nicolas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part