Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/komeda: Adds limitation check for AFBC wide block not support Rot90

From: james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
Date: Tue May 28 2019 - 02:17:36 EST

Next message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: [PATCH 00/12] ti-sysc driver changes to drop custom hwmods property"
Previous message: Wanpeng Li: "Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] KVM: X86: Implement PV sched yield hypercall"
In reply to: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China): "[PATCH v3 2/2] drm/komeda: Adds limitation check for AFBC wide block not support Rot90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:57:05AM +0800, Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> From: "Lowry Li (Arm Technology China)" <Lowry.Li@xxxxxxx>
>
> Komeda series hardware doesn't support Rot90 for AFBC wide block. So
> add limitation check to reject it if such configuration has been posted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c | 7 ++++++-
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 8 +++++++-
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.h | 5 +++--
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_pipeline_state.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c
> index 1c914f8..4563c2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c
> @@ -494,11 +494,26 @@ static int d71_enum_resources(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
> {__HW_ID(6, 7), 0/*DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT*/, 1, RICH, Rot_ALL_H_V, LYT_NM, AFB_TH},
> };
>
> +static bool d71_format_mod_supported(const struct komeda_format_caps *caps,
> + u32 layer_type, u64 modifier, u32 rot)
> +{
> + uint64_t layout = modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK;
> +
> + if ((layout == AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8) &&
> + drm_rotation_90_or_270(rot)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("D71 doesn't support ROT90 for WB-AFBC.\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static void d71_init_fmt_tbl(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
> {
> struct komeda_format_caps_table *table = &mdev->fmt_tbl;
>
> table->format_caps = d71_format_caps_table;
> + table->format_mod_supported = d71_format_mod_supported;
> table->n_formats = ARRAY_SIZE(d71_format_caps_table);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> index b219514..cd4d9f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@
> };
>
> bool komeda_format_mod_supported(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> - u32 layer_type, u32 fourcc, u64 modifier)
> + u32 layer_type, u32 fourcc, u64 modifier,
> + u32 rot)
> {
> const struct komeda_format_caps *caps;
>
> @@ -85,6 +86,10 @@ bool komeda_format_mod_supported(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> if (!(caps->supported_layer_types & layer_type))
> return false;
>
> + if (table->format_mod_supported)
> + return table->format_mod_supported(caps, layer_type, modifier,
> + rot);
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> index 96de22e..381e873 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> @@ -71,10 +71,15 @@ struct komeda_format_caps {
> *
> * @n_formats: the size of format_caps list.
> * @format_caps: format_caps list.
> + * @format_mod_supported: Optional. Some HW may have special requirements or
> + * limitations which can not be described by format_caps, this func supply HW
> + * the ability to do the further HW specific check.
> */
> struct komeda_format_caps_table {
> u32 n_formats;
> const struct komeda_format_caps *format_caps;
> + bool (*format_mod_supported)(const struct komeda_format_caps *caps,
> + u32 layer_type, u64 modifier, u32 rot);
> };
>
> extern u64 komeda_supported_modifiers[];
> @@ -100,6 +105,7 @@ u32 *komeda_get_layer_fourcc_list(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> void komeda_put_fourcc_list(u32 *fourcc_list);
>
> bool komeda_format_mod_supported(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> - u32 layer_type, u32 fourcc, u64 modifier);
> + u32 layer_type, u32 fourcc, u64 modifier,
> + u32 rot);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> index d0e713a..5f63dec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> @@ -240,20 +240,20 @@ struct drm_framebuffer *
> }
>
> /* if the fb can be supported by a specific layer */
> -bool komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(struct komeda_fb *kfb, u32 layer_type)
> +bool komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(struct komeda_fb *kfb, u32 layer_type,
> + u32 rot)
> {
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base;
> struct komeda_dev *mdev = fb->dev->dev_private;
> - const struct komeda_format_caps *caps;
> u32 fourcc = fb->format->format;
> u64 modifier = fb->modifier;
> + bool supported;
>
> - caps = komeda_get_format_caps(&mdev->fmt_tbl, fourcc, modifier);
> - if (!caps)
> - return false;
> + supported = komeda_format_mod_supported(&mdev->fmt_tbl, layer_type,
> + fourcc, modifier, rot);
> + if (!supported)
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("Layer TYPE: %d doesn't support fb FMT: %s.\n",
> + layer_type, komeda_get_format_name(fourcc, modifier));
>
> - if (!(caps->supported_layer_types & layer_type))
> - return false;
> -
> - return true;
> + return supported;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.h
> index e3bab0d..6cbb2f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.h
> @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ struct komeda_fb {
>
> struct drm_framebuffer *
> komeda_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> - const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd);
> + const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd);
> dma_addr_t
> komeda_fb_get_pixel_addr(struct komeda_fb *kfb, int x, int y, int plane);
> -bool komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(struct komeda_fb *kfb, u32 layer_type);
> +bool komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(struct komeda_fb *kfb, u32 layer_type,
> + u32 rot);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_pipeline_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_pipeline_state.c
> index 34737c0..042d4d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_pipeline_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_pipeline_state.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,11 @@ struct komeda_pipeline_state *
> struct komeda_plane_state *kplane_st,
> struct komeda_data_flow_cfg *dflow)
> {
> + struct komeda_fb *kfb = to_kfb(kplane_st->base.fb);
> +
> + if (!komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(kfb, layer->layer_type, dflow->rot))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (!in_range(&layer->hsize_in, dflow->in_w)) {
> DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("src_w: %d is out of range.\n", dflow->in_w);
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -359,7 +364,8 @@ struct komeda_pipeline_state *
> struct komeda_layer_state *st;
> int i;
>
> - if (!komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(kfb, wb_layer->layer_type))
> + if (!komeda_fb_is_layer_supported(kfb, wb_layer->layer_type,
> + dflow->rot))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> c_st = komeda_component_get_state_and_set_user(&wb_layer->base,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> index c9f37ff..798ee24 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void komeda_plane_reset(struct drm_plane *plane)
> u32 layer_type = kplane->layer->layer_type;
>
> return komeda_format_mod_supported(&mdev->fmt_tbl, layer_type,
> - format, modifier);
> + format, modifier, 0);
> }
>
> static const struct drm_plane_funcs komeda_plane_funcs = {
> --
> 1.9.1
>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@xxxxxxx>

Next message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: [PATCH 00/12] ti-sysc driver changes to drop custom hwmods property"
Previous message: Wanpeng Li: "Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] KVM: X86: Implement PV sched yield hypercall"
In reply to: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China): "[PATCH v3 2/2] drm/komeda: Adds limitation check for AFBC wide block not support Rot90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]