Re: [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 29 May 2019 05:30:56 -0400
Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, I think so. Also this patch changes CALLER_ADDR0 passed to the
> tracepoint because there's one more level of a non-inlined function call
> in the call chain right?  Very least the changelog should document this
> change in functional behavior, IMO.

This sounds more like a break in behavior not a functional change. I
guess moving it to a header and making it a static __always_inline
should be fine though.

-- Steve