Re: [PATCH, RFC 43/62] syscall/x86: Wire up a system call for MKTME encryption keys

[Alison Schofield]

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:21:37AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 05:44:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > encrypt_mprotect() is a new system call to support memory encryption.
> > 
> > It takes the same parameters as legacy mprotect, plus an additional
> > key serial number that is mapped to an encryption keyid.
> 
> Shouldn't this patch be after the encrypt_mprotect() is added?

COND_SYSCALL(encrypt_mprotect) defined in kernel/sys_ni.c, allowed
it to build in this order, but the order is not logical. Thanks for
pointing it out. I will reorder the two patches.

Alison