[PATCH 5.1 169/405] sched/rt: Check integer overflow at usec to nsec conversion
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu May 30 2019 - 00:56:10 EST
[ Upstream commit 1a010e29cfa00fee2888fd2fd4983f848cbafb58 ]
Example of unhandled overflows:
# echo 18446744073709651 > cpu.rt_runtime_us
# cat cpu.rt_runtime_us
99
# echo 18446744073709900 > cpu.rt_period_us
# cat cpu.rt_period_us
348
After this patch they will fail with -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/155125501739.293431.5252197504404771496.stgit@buzz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 90fa23d36565d..1e6b909dca367 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2555,6 +2555,8 @@ int sched_group_set_rt_runtime(struct task_group *tg, long rt_runtime_us)
rt_runtime = (u64)rt_runtime_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
if (rt_runtime_us < 0)
rt_runtime = RUNTIME_INF;
+ else if ((u64)rt_runtime_us > U64_MAX / NSEC_PER_USEC)
+ return -EINVAL;
return tg_set_rt_bandwidth(tg, rt_period, rt_runtime);
}
@@ -2575,6 +2577,9 @@ int sched_group_set_rt_period(struct task_group *tg, u64 rt_period_us)
{
u64 rt_runtime, rt_period;
+ if (rt_period_us > U64_MAX / NSEC_PER_USEC)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
rt_period = rt_period_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
rt_runtime = tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime;
--
2.20.1