RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: fix watchdog device node

[Chuanhua Han]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2019å5æ24æ 20:29
> To: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ying Zhang
> <ying.zhang22455@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: fix watchdog device node
> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:48 AM Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Rob Herring
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Leo Li
> > > Sent: 2019å5æ22æ 14:50
> 
> 
> > > > > > > > > > -             wdog0: watchdog@23c0000 {
> > > > > > > > > > -                     compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-wdt",
> > > > > "fsl,imx21-wdt";
> > > > > > > > > > -                     reg = <0x0 0x23c0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > > > > > > > > > -                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 59
> > > > > > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > > > > > > > -                     clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>;
> > > > > > > > > > -                     big-endian;
> > > > > > > > > > -                     status = "disabled";
> > > > > > > > > > +             cluster1_core0_watchdog: wdt@c000000 {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Keep 'watchdog' as the node name,
> > > > > > > > Thanks for your replay
> > > > > > > > Do you mean replace the âwdtâ with âwatchdogâ?
> > > > > > > > and keep nodes sort in unit-address.
> > > > > > > > What does this mean?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That means order the nodes by the addresses (e.g. c000000,
> > > > > > > c010000)
> > > > > > The current order is correctïThe first is c000000, then c000000ï.
> > > > >
> > > > > But they are added after gpio@2320000 and before sata@3200000.
> > > > I changed and made the second version of the patch, but I found
> > > > the following error when I executed ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > > xxx.patch to check the patch:
> > > >
> > > > WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "arm" appears un-documented
> > > > -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> > > > #43: FILE: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi:351:
> > > > + compatible = "arm,sp805", "arm,primecell";
> > > >
> > > > However, there is no vendor-prefixes.txt file in the
> > > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ directory, only vendor-
> > > > prefixes.yaml.
> > > > Moreover, there are âarmâ vendors in vendor-prefixes.yaml.
> > >
> > > Added Rob Herring to the thread.
> > >
> > > > Request helpïthanks
> > How can I solve this patch check error? Ask for help, thank you!
> 
> Ignore it. A fix to checkpatch.pl is pending.
OK, the second version has been sent. Checking with checkpatch.pl is no problem.
> 
> Rob