Re: [PATCH 15/22] docs: it: license-rules.rst: get rid of warnings

[Federico Vaga]

On Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:23:46 AM CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> There's a wrong identation on a code block, and it tries to use
> a reference that was not defined at the Italian translation.
> 
>     Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:329: WARNING:
> Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:332: WARNING:
> Unexpected indentation.
> Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:339: WARNING:
> Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:341: WARNING:
> Unexpected indentation.
> Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:305: WARNING:
> Unknown target name: "metatags".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../it_IT/process/license-rules.rst           | 28 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst
> b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst index
> f058e06996dc..06abeb7dd307 100644
> --- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ essere categorizzate in:
>       LICENSES/dual
> 
>     I file in questa cartella contengono il testo completo della rispettiva
> -   licenza e i suoi `Metatags`_.  I nomi dei file sono identici agli
> +   licenza e i suoi `Metatags`.  I nomi dei file sono identici agli

Remove 's' instead of '_' and then the link is correct

`Metatag`_

>     identificatori di licenza SPDX che dovrebbero essere usati nei file
>     sorgenti.
> 
> @@ -326,19 +326,19 @@ essere categorizzate in:
> 
>     Esempio del formato del file::
> 
> -   Valid-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1
> -   SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-1.1.html
> -   Usage-Guide:
> -     Do NOT use. The MPL-1.1 is not GPL2 compatible. It may only be used
> for -     dual-licensed files where the other license is GPL2 compatible. -
>     If you end up using this it MUST be used together with a GPL2
> compatible -     license using "OR".
> -     To use the Mozilla Public License version 1.1 put the following SPDX
> -     tag/value pair into a comment according to the placement guidelines in
> -     the licensing rules documentation:
> -   SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1
> -   License-Text:
> -     Full license text
> +    Valid-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1
> +    SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-1.1.html
> +    Usage-Guide:
> +      Do NOT use. The MPL-1.1 is not GPL2 compatible. It may only be used
> for +      dual-licensed files where the other license is GPL2 compatible.
> +      If you end up using this it MUST be used together with a GPL2
> compatible +      license using "OR".
> +      To use the Mozilla Public License version 1.1 put the following SPDX
> +      tag/value pair into a comment according to the placement guidelines
> in +      the licensing rules documentation:
> +    SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1
> +    License-Text:
> +      Full license text