Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add YADRO VESNIN BMC

[Andrew Jeffery]

Hello Alexander,

On Fri, 31 May 2019, at 15:42, Alexander Filippov wrote:
> VESNIN is an OpenPower machine with an Aspeed 2400 BMC SoC manufactured
> by YADRO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Filippov <a.filippov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                  |   1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-vesnin.dts | 234 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 235 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-vesnin.dts
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 834cce80d1b8..09a851a4705c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -1261,6 +1261,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += \
>  	aspeed-bmc-opp-palmetto.dtb \
>  	aspeed-bmc-opp-romulus.dtb \
>  	aspeed-bmc-opp-swift.dtb \
> +	aspeed-bmc-opp-vesnin.dtb \

The patch doesn't apply to upstream - the Swift machine only exists in the
OpenBMC kernel tree. Please rebase the patch onto upstream and resend.

>  	aspeed-bmc-opp-witherspoon.dtb \
>  	aspeed-bmc-opp-zaius.dtb \
>  	aspeed-bmc-portwell-neptune.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-vesnin.dts 
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-vesnin.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..20f07f5bb4f4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-vesnin.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +// Copyright 2019 YADRO
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "aspeed-g4.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/aspeed-gpio.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "Vesnin BMC";
> +	compatible = "yadro,vesnin-bmc", "aspeed,ast2400";
> +
> +	chosen {
> +		stdout-path = &uart5;
> +		bootargs = "console=ttyS4,115200 earlyprintk";
> +	};
> +
> +	memory {
> +		reg = <0x40000000 0x20000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	reserved-memory {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		vga_memory: framebuffer@5f000000 {
> +			no-map;
> +			reg = <0x5f000000 0x01000000>; /* 16MB */
> +		};
> +		flash_memory: region@5c000000 {
> +			no-map;
> +			reg = <0x5c000000 0x02000000>; /* 32M */
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	leds {
> +		compatible = "gpio-leds";
> +
> +		heartbeat {
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(R, 4) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +		power_red {
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(N, 1) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +
> +		id_blue {
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(O, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +
> +		alarm_red {
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(N, 6) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +
> +		alarm_yel {
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(N, 7) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	gpio-keys {
> +		compatible = "gpio-keys";
> +
> +		button_checkstop {
> +			label = "checkstop";
> +			linux,code = <74>;
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(P, 5) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +
> +		button_identify {
> +			label = "identify";
> +			linux,code = <152>;
> +			gpios = <&gpio ASPEED_GPIO(O, 7) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&fmc {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	flash@0 {
> +		status = "okay";
> +		m25p,fast-read;
> +        label = "bmc";
> +#include "openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi"
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&spi {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_spi1debug_default>;

Is this how the board is strapped? I'm asking in case it's just copy/paste
from Palmetto, which was (unfortunately) strapped this way.

> +
> +	flash@0 {
> +		status = "okay";
> +		label = "pnor";
> +		m25p,fast-read;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&mac0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	use-ncsi;
> +	no-hw-checksum;
> +
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_rmii1_default>;
> +};
> +
> +
> +&uart5 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&lpc_ctrl {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	memory-region = <&flash_memory>;
> +	flash = <&spi>;
> +};
> +
> +&ibt {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&lpc_host {
> +    sio_regs: regs {
> +        compatible = "aspeed,bmc-misc";

The patches for this are not upstream, and won't make it in their current
form. Please drop this node from the patch.

> +    };
> +};
> +
> +&mbox {
> +	status = "okay";

This driver is not upstream either, and we plan on dropping it from the
OpenBMC tree too. Please remove this node from the patch.

Cheers,

Andrew

> +};
> +
> +&uart3 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_txd2_default &pinctrl_rxd2_default>;
> +};
> +
> +&i2c0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	eeprom@50 {
> +		compatible = "atmel,24c256";
> +		reg = <0x50>;
> +		pagesize = <64>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c1 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	tmp75@49 {
> +		compatible = "ti,tmp75";
> +		reg = <0x49>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c2 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c3 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c4 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	occ-hwmon@50 {
> +		compatible = "ibm,p8-occ-hwmon";
> +		reg = <0x50>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c5 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	occ-hwmon@51 {
> +		compatible = "ibm,p8-occ-hwmon";
> +		reg = <0x51>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c6 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	w83795g@2f {
> +		compatible = "nuvoton,w83795g";
> +		reg = <0x2f>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c7 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	occ-hwmon@56 {
> +		compatible = "ibm,p8-occ-hwmon";
> +		reg = <0x56>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c9 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c10 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c11 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	occ-hwmon@57 {
> +		compatible = "ibm,p8-occ-hwmon";
> +		reg = <0x57>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c12 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	rtc@68 {
> +		compatible = "maxim,ds3231";
> +		reg = <0x68>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c13 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&vuart {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
>