[tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check_deadlock()

From: tip-bot for Yuyang Du
Date: Mon Jun 03 2019 - 09:16:56 EST


Commit-ID: 0b9fc8ecfa30000c8900da7adbbef23438de9ec0
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0b9fc8ecfa30000c8900da7adbbef23438de9ec0
Author: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:19:26 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:55:44 +0200

locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check_deadlock()

The lockdep_map argument in them is not used, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: frederic@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-11-duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3eecae315885..6cf14c84eb6d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2230,8 +2230,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
* Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
*/
static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
- struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
+check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read)
{
struct held_lock *prev;
struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
@@ -2789,8 +2788,9 @@ cache_hit:
return 1;
}

-static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
- struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
+ struct held_lock *hlock,
+ int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
{
/*
* Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
@@ -2816,7 +2816,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
* any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock. If
* All validations
*/
- int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, lock, hlock->read);
+ int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read);

if (!ret)
return 0;
@@ -2847,8 +2847,8 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
}
#else
static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
- struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock,
- int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+ struct held_lock *hlock,
+ int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
{
return 1;
}
@@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlock_class(hlock)->key);
}

- if (!validate_chain(curr, lock, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
+ if (!validate_chain(curr, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
return 0;

curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;