RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc/fsl/qe: cleanups and new DT binding

[Leo Li]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 2:54 PM
> To: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@xxxxxxx>; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Scott
> Wood <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>;
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; jocke@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc/fsl/qe: cleanups and new DT binding
> 
> On 13/05/2019 13.14, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This small series consists of some small cleanups and simplifications
> > of the QUICC engine driver, and introduces a new DT binding that makes
> > it much easier to support other variants of the QUICC engine IP block
> > that appears in the wild: There's no reason to expect in general that
> > the number of valid SNUMs uniquely determines the set of such, so it's
> > better to simply let the device tree specify the values (and,
> > implicitly via the array length, also the count).
> >
> > Which tree should this go through?
> 
> Ping? These patches should be ready to go in, but I don't know who is
> supposed to pick them up.

I can pick them up through the soc/fsl tree.

Regards,
Leo