Re: [RFC PATCH 46/57] driver: Add variants of driver_find_device()

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 04/06/2019 12:32, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 11:55:36AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 04/06/2019 09:45, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > > On 03/06/2019 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:50:12PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > > > > Add a wrappers to lookup a device by name for a given driver, by various
> > > > > generic properties of a device. This can avoid the proliferation of custom
> > > > > match functions throughout the drivers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >     include/linux/device.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >     1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > You should put the "here are the new functions that everyone can use"
> > > > much earlier in the patch series, otherwise it's hard to dig out.
> > >
> > > Sure, I will add it in the respective commits.
> > >
> > > > And if you send just those as an individual series, and they look good,
> > > > I can queue them up now so that everyone else can take the individual
> > > > patches through their respective trees.
> > >
> > > I see. I think I may be able to do that.
> >
> > The API change patch (i.e, "drivers: Unify the match prototype for
> > bus_find_device with class_find_device" ) is tricky and prevents us from
> > doing
> > this. So, that patch has to come via your tree as it must be a one shot change.
> > And that would make the individual subsystem patches conflict with your tree.
> > Also, it would break the builds until the individual subsystem trees are merged
> > with your tree with the new API.
> >
> > So I am not quite sure what the best approach here would be.

I was under the assumption that the changes are minimal for the subsystems to
allow the series queued as one shot through your tree, with Acks from the
individual maintainers. However, if thats not how it works, I can split the
series.

> That's for you to work out :)
>
> one-shot changes are usually not a good idea, there are lots of ways to
> prevent this from being required.

Sure, I will rework the series.

> good luck!

Thank  :-)

Suzuki