Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IR receiver node

From: OndÅej Jirman
Date: Tue Jun 04 2019 - 11:34:06 EST

Next message: OndÅej Jirman: "Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i-h6-r: Fix incorrect W1 clock gate register"
Previous message: Zhiqiang Liu: "Re: [PATCH next] sysctl: add proc_dointvec_jiffies_minmax to limit the min/max write value"
In reply to: ClÃment PÃron: "Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IR receiver node"
Next in thread: ClÃment PÃron: "Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IR receiver node"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi ClÃment,

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 05:04:07PM +0200, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:47, OndÅej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ClÃment,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 02:33:55PM +0200, verejna wrote:
> > > Hi ClÃment,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:58:23PM +0200, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
> > > > Hi Ondrej,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 14:46, OndÅej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello ClÃment,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:25:32AM +0200, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Ondrej,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 16:55, OndÅej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello ClÃment,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 06:14:38PM +0200, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
> > > > > > > > Allwinner H6 IR is similar to A31 and can use same driver.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Add support for it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: ClÃment PÃron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi
> > > > > > > > index 16c5c3d0fd81..649cbdfe452e 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi
> > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi
> > > > > > > > @@ -647,6 +647,25 @@
> > > > > > > > pins = "PL0", "PL1";
> > > > > > > > function = "s_i2c";
> > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + r_ir_rx_pin: r-ir-rx-pin {
> > > > > > > > + pins = "PL9";
> > > > > > > > + function = "s_cir_rx";
> > > > > > > > + };
> > > > > > > > + };
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + r_ir: ir@7040000 {
> > > > > > > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-ir",
> > > > > > > > + "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ir";
> > > > > > > > + reg = <0x07040000 0x400>;
> > > > > > > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 109 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > > > > > + clocks = <&r_ccu CLK_R_APB1_IR>,
> > > > > > > > + <&r_ccu CLK_IR>;
> > > > > > > > + clock-names = "apb", "ir";
> > > > > > > > + resets = <&r_ccu RST_R_APB1_IR>;
> > > > > > > > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > > > > > + pinctrl-0 = <&r_ir_rx_pin>;
> > > > > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please make a comment here, that this is known broken on some boards and may
> > > > > > > result IRQ flood if enabled. Otherwise noone will know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm planning to send a v4 next week with the IRQ_NONE return as Maxime
> > > > > > suggested it.
> > > > > > https://github.com/clementperon/linux/tree/h6_ir_v4
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But maybe we could also use the bit 5 of the IRQ status.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, that's nice, but that will not make the HW work. That will just disable
> > > > > it. The comment is still necessary.
> > > > I have pushed a new version on my github.
> > > > https://github.com/clementperon/linux/commits/h6_ir_v4
> > > >
> > > > I will submit it, if you are ok with it.
> > >
> > > the changes make it worse. Console is flooded with "Temporarily disable IRQ"
> > > and other symptoms are the same as I described before. Interrupts are not
> > > disabled in a any reasonable time. (I've waited for more > 5mins already.)
> > >
> > > You probably need to disable interrupts right away, not wait for 100k failures.
> >
> > Hmm, this is what the registers look like post-probe:
> >
> > R_CIR:
> > 0x07040000 : 00000030
> > 0x07040004 : 00000030
> > 0x07040008 : 00000030
> > 0x0704000c : 00000030
> > 0x07040010 : 00000030
> > 0x07040014 : 00000030
> > 0x07040018 : 00000030
> > 0x0704001c : 00000030
> > 0x07040020 : 00000030
> > 0x07040024 : 00000030
> > 0x07040028 : 00000030
> > 0x0704002c : 00000030
> > 0x07040030 : 00000030
> > 0x07040034 : 00000030
> > 0x07040038 : 00000030
> > 0x0704003c : 00000030
> > 0x07040040 : 00000030
> > 0x07040044 : 00000030
> > 0x07040048 : 00000030
> > 0x0704004c : 00000030
> > 0x07040050 : 00000030
> > 0x07040054 : 00000030
> > 0x07040058 : 00000030
> > 0x0704005c : 00000030
> > 0x07040060 : 00000030
> > 0x07040064 : 00000030
> > 0x07040068 : 00000030
> > 0x0704006c : 00000030
> > 0x07040070 : 00000030
> > 0x07040074 : 00000030
> > 0x07040078 : 00000030
> > 0x0704007c : 00000030
> > 0x07040080 : 00000030
> > 0x07040084 : 00000030
> > 0x07040088 : 00000030
> > 0x0704008c : 00000030
> > 0x07040090 : 00000030
> > 0x07040094 : 00000030
> > 0x07040098 : 00000030
> > 0x0704009c : 00000030
> > 0x070400a0 : 00000030
> > 0x070400a4 : 00000030
> > 0x070400a8 : 00000030
> > 0x070400ac : 00000030
> > 0x070400b0 : 00000030
> > 0x070400b4 : 00000030
> > 0x070400b8 : 00000030
> > 0x070400bc : 00000030
> > 0x070400c0 : 00000030
> > 0x070400c4 : 00000030
> > 0x070400c8 : 00000030
> > 0x070400cc : 00000030
> > 0x070400d0 : 00000030
> > 0x070400d4 : 00000030
> > 0x070400d8 : 00000030
> > 0x070400dc : 00000030
> > 0x070400e0 : 00000030
> > 0x070400e4 : 00000030
> > 0x070400e8 : 00000030
> > 0x070400ec : 00000030
> > 0x070400f0 : 00000030
> > 0x070400f4 : 00000030
> > 0x070400f8 : 00000030
> > 0x070400fc : 00000030
> >
> > Clearly not right. It's just the R_CIR module, other modules have normal values.
> >
> > I've checked:
> > 0x070101c0 : 81000002
> > (IR clock config register)
> > 0x070101cc : 00010000
> > (IR reset/bus clk gate reg)
> >
> > static const char * const r_mod0_default_parents[] = { "osc32k", "osc24M" };
> > static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(ir_clk, "ir",
> > r_mod0_default_parents, 0x1c0,
> > 0, 5, /* M */
> > 8, 2, /* P */
> > 24, 1, /* mux */
> > BIT(31), /* gate */
> > 0);
> >
> > static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(r_apb1_ir_clk, "r-apb1-ir", "r-apb1",
> > 0x1cc, BIT(0), 0);
> >
> > [RST_R_APB1_IR] = { 0x1cc, BIT(16) },
> >
> > So parent clock seems to be OK. But gate clock is not enabled, so the bus
> > is not working.
> >
> > And look at this!!:
> >
> > static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(r_apb1_ir_clk, "r-apb1-ir", "r-apb1",
> > 0x1cc, BIT(0), 0);
> > static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(r_apb1_w1_clk, "r-apb1-w1", "r-apb1",
> > 0x1cc, BIT(0), 0);
> >
> > So, it's wrong w1 gate config!
> >
> > You can drop your changes, because I've probbably found the root cause.
>
> Nice to see that you have found the issue, but I don't understand why
> It's working on my board on not on yours.

Maybe you use modules? I have a builtin driver.

That may change initialization order. It would disable unused gates first, and
when you load the module later from userpsace then it would enable the gate.

If builtin, then it would enable IR gate first, and then disable the unused
gates (W1 in this case), later on when entering userspace.

Anyway, I can confirm that now, when I turn on the light in the room, I get
around 10 interrupts with empty FIFO and than it stops.

It doesn't cause the flood anymore.

regards,
o.

> Regards,
> ClÃment
>
> >
> > regards,
> > o.
> >
> > > thank you and regards,
> > > o.
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > ClÃment
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > thank you,
> > > > > o.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Regards, Clement
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > > o.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > r_i2c: i2c@7081400 {
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > 2.20.1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > > > > > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/CAJiuCce7nHSktVsDKcR8GLRpD3WrN5yP3Nb_Hbu_Q9NjUQbSMw%40mail.gmail.com.
> > > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Next message: OndÅej Jirman: "Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i-h6-r: Fix incorrect W1 clock gate register"
Previous message: Zhiqiang Liu: "Re: [PATCH next] sysctl: add proc_dointvec_jiffies_minmax to limit the min/max write value"
In reply to: ClÃment PÃron: "Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IR receiver node"
Next in thread: ClÃment PÃron: "Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IR receiver node"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]