Re: [PATCH RESEND V4 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Move watchdog node into scu node

[Shawn Guo]

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:09:12AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Shawn
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 2:00 PM
> > To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > festevam@xxxxxxxxx; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>;
> > ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>; Peng Fan
> > <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V4 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Move watchdog
> > node into scu node
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:06:28AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Hi, Shawn
> > > 	The driver and binding doc are already reviewed and waiting for DT
> > patch, will you help review this DT patch?
> > 
> > I'm fine with it.  Should I just pick this patch up, or is there any dependency
> > we need to handle?
> 
> No dependency, it just makes more sense to move the node into SCU node as it is NOW depending on SCU
> driver. Once you pick up this patch

Just applied.

> (and maybe the dt-binding patch as well?),

It makes more sense to have it go through watchdog tree.

Shawn

> I will notify the watchdog
> maintainer to pick up the watchdog patch in this series.