Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/17] PTP support for the SJA1105 DSA driver
From: Vladimir Oltean
Date: Wed Jun 05 2019 - 14:13:14 EST
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 20:45, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:33:52PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > In the meantime: Richard, do you have any objections to this patchset?
>
> I like the fact that you didn't have to change the dsa or ptp
> frameworks this time around. I haven't taken a closer look than that
> yet.
>
There's one more thing I wanted to ask you if you get the chance to
take a closer look.
Currently I'm using a cyclecounter, but I *will* need actual PHC
manipulations for the time-based shaping and policing features that
the switch has in hardware. On the other hand I get much tighter sync
offset using the free-running counter than with hardware-corrected
timestamps. So as far as I see it, I'll need to have two sets of
operations.
How should I design such a dual-PHC device driver? Just register two
separate clocks, one for the timestamping counter, the other for the
scheduling/policing PTP clock, and have phc2sys keep them in sync
externally to the driver? Or implement the hardware corrections
alongside the timecounter ones, and expose a single PHC (and for
clock_gettime, just pick one of the time sources)?
> > I was wondering whether the path delay difference between E2E and P2P
> > rings any bell to you.
>
> Can it be that the switch applies corrections in HW?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Thanks,
-Vladimir