Re: [PATCH 01/13] acpi: utils: Cleanup acpi_dev_match_cb

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:14 PM Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> acpi_dev_match_cb match function modifies the "data" argument
> to pass on a result which could be easily deduced from the result
> of the bus_find_device() call at the caller site. Clean this
> up in preparation to convert the "match" argument for bus_find_device
> to accept a "const" data pointer, similar to class_find_device. This
> would allow consolidating the match routines for these two APIs.

This changelog can be improved IMO.

In fact, the final goal here is to pass (const void *) as the second
argument to acpi_dev_match_cb() (which you could do right away in this
patch if I'm not mistaken) which is because you want to modify the
prototype of bus_find_device().

So why don't you write something like this in the changelog:

"The prototype of bus_find_device() will be unified with that of
class_find_device() subsequently, but for this purpose the callback
functions passed to it need to take (const void *) as the second
argument.  Consequently, they cannot modify the memory pointed to by
that argument which currently is not the case for acpi_dev_match_cb().
However, acpi_dev_match_cb() really need not modify the "match" object
passed to it, because acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev() which uses it via
bus_find_device() can easily convert the result of bus_find_device()
into the pointer to return.

For this reason, update acpi_dev_match_cb() to avoid the redundant
memory updates and change the type of its second argument to (const
void *)."

>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/utils.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index 7def63a..1391b63 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -725,8 +725,6 @@ bool acpi_dev_found(const char *hid)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_dev_found);
>
>  struct acpi_dev_match_info {
> -       const char *dev_name;
> -       struct acpi_device *adev;
>         struct acpi_device_id hid[2];
>         const char *uid;
>         s64 hrv;
> @@ -746,9 +744,6 @@ static int acpi_dev_match_cb(struct device *dev, void *data)

And why not to change the type of the second arg to "const void *data" here?

>             strcmp(adev->pnp.unique_id, match->uid)))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       match->dev_name = acpi_dev_name(adev);
> -       match->adev = adev;
> -
>         if (match->hrv == -1)
>                 return 1;
>
> @@ -818,7 +813,7 @@ acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv)
>         match.hrv = hrv;
>
>         dev = bus_find_device(&acpi_bus_type, NULL, &match, acpi_dev_match_cb);
> -       return dev ? match.adev : NULL;
> +       return dev ? to_acpi_device(dev) : NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev);
>
> --