Re: [PATCH trivial] mm/vmalloc: Spelling s/configuraion/configuration/

[Souptick Joarder]

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:05 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject line should be s/informaion/information. With that fix,
Acked-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 7350a124524bb4b2..08b8b5a117576561 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2783,7 +2783,7 @@ static int aligned_vwrite(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count)
>   * Note: In usual ops, vread() is never necessary because the caller
>   * should know vmalloc() area is valid and can use memcpy().
>   * This is for routines which have to access vmalloc area without
> - * any informaion, as /dev/kmem.
> + * any information, as /dev/kmem.
>   *
>   * Return: number of bytes for which addr and buf should be increased
>   * (same number as @count) or %0 if [addr...addr+count) doesn't
> @@ -2862,7 +2862,7 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count)
>   * Note: In usual ops, vwrite() is never necessary because the caller
>   * should know vmalloc() area is valid and can use memcpy().
>   * This is for routines which have to access vmalloc area without
> - * any informaion, as /dev/kmem.
> + * any information, as /dev/kmem.
>   *
>   * Return: number of bytes for which addr and buf should be
>   * increased (same number as @count) or %0 if [addr...addr+count)
> --
> 2.17.1
>