[PATCH 2/2] swiotlb: Return consistent SWIOTLB segments/nr_tbl

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue Jun 11 2019 - 14:03:27 EST


With a specifically contrived memory layout where there is no physical
memory available to the kernel below the 4GB boundary, we will fail to
perform the initial swiotlb_init() call and set no_iotlb_memory to true.

There are drivers out there that call into swiotlb_nr_tbl() to determine
whether they can use the SWIOTLB. With the right DMA_BIT_MASK() value
for these drivers (say 64-bit), they won't ever need to hit
swiotlb_tbl_map_single() so this can go unoticed and we would be
possibly lying about those drivers.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index b2b5c5df273c..e906ef2e6315 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -129,15 +129,17 @@ setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
}
early_param("swiotlb", setup_io_tlb_npages);

+static bool no_iotlb_memory;
+
unsigned long swiotlb_nr_tbl(void)
{
- return io_tlb_nslabs;
+ return unlikely(no_iotlb_memory) ? 0 : io_tlb_nslabs;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(swiotlb_nr_tbl);

unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void)
{
- return max_segment;
+ return unlikely(no_iotlb_memory) ? 0 : max_segment;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(swiotlb_max_segment);

@@ -160,8 +162,6 @@ unsigned long swiotlb_size_or_default(void)
return size ? size : (IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE);
}

-static bool no_iotlb_memory;
-
void swiotlb_print_info(void)
{
unsigned long bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
--
2.17.1