Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 06/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Personally I don't think anyone sane would intentionally depend on this
> and I don't think there is a sufficiently reliable way to depend on this
> by accident that people would actually be depending on it.

Agreed.

As I said I like these changes and I see nothing wrong. To me they fix the
current behaviour, or at least make it more consistent.

But perhaps this should be documented in the changelog? To make it clear
that this change was intentional.

Oleg.