Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/komeda: Adds komeda_kms_drop_master

[james qian wang (Arm Technology China)]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 02:30:38PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:13:45AM +0000, Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > From: "Lowry Li (Arm Technology China)" <Lowry.Li@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > The komeda internal resources (pipelines) are shared between crtcs,
> > and resources release by disable_crtc. This commit is working for once
> > user forgot disabling crtc like app quit abnomally, and then the
> > resources can not be used by another crtc. Adds drop_master to
> > shutdown the device and make sure all the komeda resources have been
> > released and can be used for the next usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > index 8543860..647bce5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > @@ -54,11 +54,24 @@ static irqreturn_t komeda_kms_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> >  return status;
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Komeda internal resources (pipelines) are shared between crtcs, and resources
> > + * are released by disable_crtc. But if user forget disabling crtc like app quit
> > + * abnormally, the resources can not be used by another crtc.
> > + * Use drop_master to shutdown the device and make sure all the komeda resources
> > + * have been released, and can be used for the next usage.
> > + */
>
> No. If we want this, we need to implement this across drivers, not with
> per-vendor hacks.
>
> The kerneldoc should have been a solid hint: "Only used by vmwgfx."
> -Daniel

Hi Daniel:
This drop_master is really what we want, can we update the doc and
add komeda as a user of this hacks like "used by vmwfgx and komeda",
or maybe directly promote this per-vendor hacks as an optional chip
function ?

James

> > +static void komeda_kms_drop_master(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +   struct drm_file *file_priv)
> > +{
> > +drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct drm_driver komeda_kms_driver = {
> >  .driver_features = DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_MODESET | DRIVER_ATOMIC |
> >     DRIVER_PRIME | DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ,
> >  .lastclose= drm_fb_helper_lastclose,
> >  .irq_handler= komeda_kms_irq_handler,
> > +.master_drop= komeda_kms_drop_master,
> >  .gem_free_object_unlocked= drm_gem_cma_free_object,
> >  .gem_vm_ops= &drm_gem_cma_vm_ops,
> >  .dumb_create= komeda_gem_cma_dumb_create,
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.