Re: [PATCH] lib: debugobjects: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

[Joel Fernandes]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:10 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:58:19PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:35:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > > never do something different based on this.
> > >
> > > Cc: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Zhong Jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/debugobjects.c | 14 ++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> > > index 55437fd5128b..2ac42286cd08 100644
> > > --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> > > +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> > > @@ -850,26 +850,16 @@ static const struct file_operations debug_stats_fops = {
> > >
> > >  static int __init debug_objects_init_debugfs(void)
> > >  {
> > > -   struct dentry *dbgdir, *dbgstats;
> > > +   struct dentry *dbgdir;
> > >
> > >     if (!debug_objects_enabled)
> > >             return 0;
> > >
> > >     dbgdir = debugfs_create_dir("debug_objects", NULL);
> > > -   if (!dbgdir)
> > > -           return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > -   dbgstats = debugfs_create_file("stats", 0444, dbgdir, NULL,
> > > -                                  &debug_stats_fops);
> > > -   if (!dbgstats)
> > > -           goto err;
> > > +   debugfs_create_file("stats", 0444, dbgdir, NULL, &debug_stats_fops);
> >
> >
> > One weirdness is, if dbgdir is ever NULL, then debugfs_create_file() may end
> > up creating the stats file in the root.
>
> Yes, but dbgdir can not be NULL.

Makes sense, thanks for clarification,

- Joel