Re: [PATCH] locking/static_key: always define static_branch_deferred_inc

[Willem de Bruijn]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 5:33 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:56:27PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:25:16 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:59 PM Jakub Kicinski
> > > <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:44:09 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > > > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > This interface is currently only defined if CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL. Make it
> > > > > available also when jump labels are disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: ad282a8117d50 ("locking/static_key: Add support for deferred static branches")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > The original patch went into 5.2-rc1, but this interface is not yet
> > > > > used, so this could target either 5.2 or 5.3.
> > > >
> > > > Can we drop the Fixes tag?  It's an ugly omission but not a bug fix.
> > > >
> > > > Are you planning to switch clean_acked_data_enable() to the helper once
> > > > merged?
> > >
> > > Definitely, can do.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's easiest to send both as a single patch set through net-next, then?
> >
> > I'd think so too, perhaps we can get a blessing from Peter for that :)
>
> Sure that works, I don't think there's anything else pending for this
> file to conflict with.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Great, thanks. Sent

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=113601