On 6/13/2019 3:32 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
This is not about Fixes tag, but Cc tag:
Le 13/06/2019 Ã 14:24, Horia Geanta a ÃcritÂ:
On 6/13/2019 3:16 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Yes, but you should remove the Fixes tag.
Le 13/06/2019 Ã 14:13, Horia Geanta a ÃcritÂ:
On 6/11/2019 5:39 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Next patch will require struct talitos_edesc to be definedAgain, this patch does not qualify as a fix.
earlier in talitos.c
This patch moves it into talitos.h so that it can be used
from any place in talitos.c
Fixes: 37b5e8897eb5 ("crypto: talitos - chain in buffered data for ahash on SEC1")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
But as I said, the following one is a fix and require that one, you told
me to add stable in Cc: to make it explicit it was to go into stable.
And probably replace "Next patch" with the commit headline.
If someone tries to merge following one into stable with taking that oneThis shouldn't happen, order from main tree should be preserved.
first, build will fail.
When they pick up fixes, AFAIK they don't take all the preceeding commits.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1