On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:02:52AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
On 13/06/2019 21:09, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:39:12AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
On 13/06/2019 03:39, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
I'm not sure it's even safe, because CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO depends on
ARM64, but PCI_IOBASE is defined on most arches via asm-generic/io.h,
so this potentially affects arches other than ARM64.
It would do. It would affect any arch which defines PCI_IOBASE and
does not have arch-specific definition of inb et all.
What's the reason for testing PCI_IOBASE instead of
CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO? If there's a reason it's needed, that's fine,
but it does make this much more complicated to review.
For ARM64, we have PCI_IOBASE defined but may not have
CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO defined. Currently CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO is only
selected by CONFIG_HISILICON_LPC.
As such, we should make this change also for when
CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO is not defined.
OK. This is all very important for the commit log -- we need to
understand what arches are affected and the reason they need it.
Since the goal of this series is to fix an ARM64-specific issue,
the typical port I/O model is for each arch to #define its own inb(),
maybe it would make sense to move the "#define inb logic_inb" from
linux/logic_pio.h to arm64/include/asm/io.h?
The "#ifndef inb" arrangement gets pretty complicated when it occurs
more than one place (asm-generic/io.h and logic_pio.h) and we have to
start worrying about the ordering of #includes.
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel