[tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation

From: tip-bot for Waiman Long
Date: Mon Jun 17 2019 - 10:33:13 EST

Commit-ID: 4f23dbc1e657951e5d94c60369bc1db065961fb3
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4f23dbc1e657951e5d94c60369bc1db065961fb3
Author: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:59:06 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:27:59 +0200

locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation

Because of writer lock stealing, it is possible that a constant
stream of incoming writers will cause a waiting writer or reader to
wait indefinitely leading to lock starvation.

This patch implements a lock handoff mechanism to disable lock stealing
and force lock handoff to the first waiter or waiters (for readers)
in the queue after at least a 4ms waiting period unless it is a RT
writer task which doesn't need to wait. The waiting period is used to
avoid discouraging lock stealing too much to affect performance.

The setting and clearing of the handoff bit is serialized by the
wait_lock. So racing is not possible.

A rwsem microbenchmark was run for 5 seconds on a 2-socket 40-core
80-thread Skylake system with a v5.1 based kernel and 240 write_lock
threads with 5us sleep critical section.

Before the patch, the min/mean/max numbers of locking operations for
the locking threads were 1/7,792/173,696. After the patch, the figures
became 5,842/6,542/7,458. It can be seen that the rwsem became much
more fair, though there was a drop of about 16% in the mean locking
operations done which was a tradeoff of having better fairness.

Making the waiter set the handoff bit right after the first wakeup can
impact performance especially with a mixed reader/writer workload. With
the same microbenchmark with short critical section and equal number of
reader and writer threads (40/40), the reader/writer locking operation
counts with the current patch were:

40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/1,794/1,796
40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/34,956/86,081

By making waiter set handoff bit immediately after wakeup:

40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/44/46
40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/1,263/3,191

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-8-longman@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h | 2 +
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
index 11187a1d40b8..634b47fd8b5e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
@@ -61,5 +61,7 @@ LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_fail) /* # of failed opt-spinnings */
LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock) /* # of read locks acquired */
LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_fast) /* # of fast read locks acquired */
LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_fail) /* # of failed read lock acquisitions */
+LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_handoff) /* # of read lock handoffs */
LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wlock) /* # of write locks acquired */
LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wlock_fail) /* # of failed write lock acquisitions */
+LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wlock_handoff) /* # of write lock handoffs */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 8d0f2acfe13d..decda9fb8c6d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -10,8 +10,9 @@
* Optimistic spinning by Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
* and Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>. Based on mutexes.
*
- * Rwsem count bit fields re-definition and rwsem rearchitecture
- * by Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>.
+ * Rwsem count bit fields re-definition and rwsem rearchitecture by
+ * Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> and
+ * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
*/

#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -74,20 +75,33 @@
*
* Bit 0 - writer locked bit
* Bit 1 - waiters present bit
- * Bits 2-7 - reserved
+ * Bit 2 - lock handoff bit
+ * Bits 3-7 - reserved
* Bits 8-X - 24-bit (32-bit) or 56-bit reader count
*
* atomic_long_fetch_add() is used to obtain reader lock, whereas
* atomic_long_cmpxchg() will be used to obtain writer lock.
+ *
+ * There are three places where the lock handoff bit may be set or cleared.
+ * 1) rwsem_mark_wake() for readers.
+ * 2) rwsem_try_write_lock() for writers.
+ * 3) Error path of rwsem_down_write_slowpath().
+ *
+ * For all the above cases, wait_lock will be held. A writer must also
+ * be the first one in the wait_list to be eligible for setting the handoff
+ * bit. So concurrent setting/clearing of handoff bit is not possible.
*/
#define RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED (1UL << 0)
#define RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS (1UL << 1)
+#define RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF (1UL << 2)
+
#define RWSEM_READER_SHIFT 8
#define RWSEM_READER_BIAS (1UL << RWSEM_READER_SHIFT)
#define RWSEM_READER_MASK (~(RWSEM_READER_BIAS - 1))
#define RWSEM_WRITER_MASK RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED
#define RWSEM_LOCK_MASK (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_READER_MASK)
-#define RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)
+#define RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|\
+ RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)

/*
* All writes to owner are protected by WRITE_ONCE() to make sure that
@@ -216,7 +230,10 @@ struct rwsem_waiter {
struct list_head list;
struct task_struct *task;
enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
+ unsigned long timeout;
};
+#define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \
+ list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list)

enum rwsem_wake_type {
RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, /* Wake whatever's at head of wait list */
@@ -224,6 +241,19 @@ enum rwsem_wake_type {
RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED /* Waker thread holds the read lock */
};

+enum writer_wait_state {
+ WRITER_NOT_FIRST, /* Writer is not first in wait list */
+ WRITER_FIRST, /* Writer is first in wait list */
+ WRITER_HANDOFF /* Writer is first & handoff needed */
+};
+
+/*
+ * The typical HZ value is either 250 or 1000. So set the minimum waiting
+ * time to at least 4ms or 1 jiffy (if it is higher than 4ms) in the wait
+ * queue before initiating the handoff protocol.
+ */
+#define RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT DIV_ROUND_UP(HZ, 250)
+
/*
* handle the lock release when processes blocked on it that can now run
* - if we come here from up_xxxx(), then the RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS bit must
@@ -244,11 +274,13 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
long oldcount, woken = 0, adjustment = 0;
struct list_head wlist;

+ lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
+
/*
* Take a peek at the queue head waiter such that we can determine
* the wakeup(s) to perform.
*/
- waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
+ waiter = rwsem_first_waiter(sem);

if (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
if (wake_type == RWSEM_WAKE_ANY) {
@@ -275,7 +307,18 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
adjustment = RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
oldcount = atomic_long_fetch_add(adjustment, &sem->count);
if (unlikely(oldcount & RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)) {
- atomic_long_sub(adjustment, &sem->count);
+ /*
+ * When we've been waiting "too" long (for writers
+ * to give up the lock), request a HANDOFF to
+ * force the issue.
+ */
+ if (!(oldcount & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) &&
+ time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)) {
+ adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+ lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_handoff);
+ }
+
+ atomic_long_add(-adjustment, &sem->count);
return;
}
/*
@@ -317,6 +360,13 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
}

+ /*
+ * When we've woken a reader, we no longer need to force writers
+ * to give up the lock and we can clear HANDOFF.
+ */
+ if (woken && (atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))
+ adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+
if (adjustment)
atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count);

@@ -346,23 +396,48 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
* This function must be called with the sem->wait_lock held to prevent
* race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the
* sem->count accordingly.
+ *
+ * If wstate is WRITER_HANDOFF, it will make sure that either the handoff
+ * bit is set or the lock is acquired with handoff bit cleared.
*/
-static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem,
+ enum writer_wait_state wstate)
{
long new;

- if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK)
- return false;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);

- new = count + RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED -
- (list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list) ? RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS : 0);
+ do {
+ bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);

- if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new)) {
- rwsem_set_owner(sem);
- return true;
- }
+ if (has_handoff && wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST)
+ return false;

- return false;
+ new = count;
+
+ if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
+ if (has_handoff || (wstate != WRITER_HANDOFF))
+ return false;
+
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+ } else {
+ new |= RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED;
+ new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+
+ if (list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
+ new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
+ }
+ } while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new));
+
+ /*
+ * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or
+ * set the handoff bit.
+ */
+ if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)
+ return false;
+
+ rwsem_set_owner(sem);
+ return true;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
@@ -373,9 +448,9 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);

- while (!(count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK)) {
+ while (!(count & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count,
- count + RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED)) {
+ count | RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED)) {
rwsem_set_owner(sem);
lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_wlock);
return true;
@@ -456,6 +531,11 @@ static noinline enum owner_state rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)

rcu_read_lock();
for (;;) {
+ if (atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) {
+ state = OWNER_NONSPINNABLE;
+ break;
+ }
+
tmp = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
if (tmp != owner) {
state = rwsem_owner_state((unsigned long)tmp);
@@ -553,16 +633,18 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)

waiter.task = current;
waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
+ waiter.timeout = jiffies + RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;

raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/*
* In case the wait queue is empty and the lock isn't owned
- * by a writer, this reader can exit the slowpath and return
- * immediately as its RWSEM_READER_BIAS has already been
- * set in the count.
+ * by a writer or has the handoff bit set, this reader can
+ * exit the slowpath and return immediately as its
+ * RWSEM_READER_BIAS has already been set in the count.
*/
- if (!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)) {
+ if (!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) &
+ (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fast);
@@ -609,8 +691,10 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
return sem;
out_nolock:
list_del(&waiter.list);
- if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
- atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
+ if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
+ atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF,
+ &sem->count);
+ }
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fail);
@@ -624,7 +708,7 @@ static struct rw_semaphore *
rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
{
long count;
- bool waiting = true; /* any queued threads before us */
+ enum writer_wait_state wstate;
struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
struct rw_semaphore *ret = sem;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
@@ -639,66 +723,95 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
*/
waiter.task = current;
waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE;
+ waiter.timeout = jiffies + RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;

raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);

/* account for this before adding a new element to the list */
- if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
- waiting = false;
+ wstate = list_empty(&sem->wait_list) ? WRITER_FIRST : WRITER_NOT_FIRST;

list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);

/* we're now waiting on the lock */
- if (waiting) {
+ if (wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) {
count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);

/*
- * If there were already threads queued before us and there are
- * no active writers and some readers, the lock must be read
- * owned; so we try to any read locks that were queued ahead
- * of us.
+ * If there were already threads queued before us and:
+ * 1) there are no no active locks, wake the front
+ * queued process(es) as the handoff bit might be set.
+ * 2) there are no active writers and some readers, the lock
+ * must be read owned; so we try to wake any read lock
+ * waiters that were queued ahead of us.
*/
- if (!(count & RWSEM_WRITER_MASK) &&
- (count & RWSEM_READER_MASK)) {
- rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READERS, &wake_q);
- /*
- * The wakeup is normally called _after_ the wait_lock
- * is released, but given that we are proactively waking
- * readers we can deal with the wake_q overhead as it is
- * similar to releasing and taking the wait_lock again
- * for attempting rwsem_try_write_lock().
- */
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ if (count & RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)
+ goto wait;

- /*
- * Reinitialize wake_q after use.
- */
- wake_q_init(&wake_q);
- }
+ rwsem_mark_wake(sem, (count & RWSEM_READER_MASK)
+ ? RWSEM_WAKE_READERS
+ : RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);

+ /*
+ * The wakeup is normally called _after_ the wait_lock
+ * is released, but given that we are proactively waking
+ * readers we can deal with the wake_q overhead as it is
+ * similar to releasing and taking the wait_lock again
+ * for attempting rwsem_try_write_lock().
+ */
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+
+ /* We need wake_q again below, reinitialize */
+ wake_q_init(&wake_q);
} else {
count = atomic_long_add_return(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
}

+wait:
/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
set_current_state(state);
while (true) {
- if (rwsem_try_write_lock(count, sem))
+ if (rwsem_try_write_lock(count, sem, wstate))
break;
+
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);

/* Block until there are no active lockers. */
- do {
+ for (;;) {
if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
goto out_nolock;

schedule();
lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
set_current_state(state);
+ /*
+ * If HANDOFF bit is set, unconditionally do
+ * a trylock.
+ */
+ if (wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF)
+ break;
+
+ if ((wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) &&
+ (rwsem_first_waiter(sem) == &waiter))
+ wstate = WRITER_FIRST;
+
count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
- } while (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK);
+ if (!(count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK))
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * The setting of the handoff bit is deferred
+ * until rwsem_try_write_lock() is called.
+ */
+ if ((wstate == WRITER_FIRST) && (rt_task(current) ||
+ time_after(jiffies, waiter.timeout))) {
+ wstate = WRITER_HANDOFF;
+ lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
+ break;
+ }
+ }

raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+ count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
list_del(&waiter.list);
@@ -711,6 +824,10 @@ out_nolock:
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
list_del(&waiter.list);
+
+ if (unlikely(wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF))
+ atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF, &sem->count);
+
if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
else
@@ -726,7 +843,7 @@ out_nolock:
* handle waking up a waiter on the semaphore
* - up_read/up_write has decremented the active part of count if we come here
*/
-static struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count)
{
unsigned long flags;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
@@ -859,7 +976,7 @@ inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS))
- rwsem_wake(sem);
+ rwsem_wake(sem, tmp);
}

/*
@@ -873,7 +990,7 @@ static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rwsem_clear_owner(sem);
tmp = atomic_long_fetch_add_release(-RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED, &sem->count);
if (unlikely(tmp & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS))
- rwsem_wake(sem);
+ rwsem_wake(sem, tmp);
}

/*