Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] clk: tegra20/30: Add custom EMC clock implementation

From: Thierry Reding
Date: Tue Jun 18 2019 - 08:26:15 EST


On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:35:42AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> A proper External Memory Controller clock rounding and parent selection
> functionality is required by the EMC drivers. It is not available using
> the generic clock implementation, hence add a custom one. The clock rate
> rounding shall be done by the EMC drivers because they have information
> about available memory timings, so the drivers will have to register a
> callback that will round the requested rate. EMC clock users won't be able
> to request EMC clock by getting -EPROBE_DEFER until EMC driver is probed
> and the callback is set up. The functionality is somewhat similar to the
> clk-emc.c which serves Tegra124+ SoC's, the later HW generations support
> more parent clock sources and the HW configuration and integration with
> the EMC drivers differs a tad from the older gens, hence it's not really
> worth to try to squash everything into a single source file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20-emc.c | 305 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 55 ++---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 38 +++-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h | 6 +
> include/linux/clk/tegra.h | 14 ++
> 6 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20-emc.c

Hi Mike, Stephen,

The remaining patches of this series have a build-time dependency on
this clock driver patch. Would you mind if I pick this up into the Tegra
tree, so that I can resolve the dependency there? I can send a pull
request of the stable branch with this one patch if we need to resolve a
conflict between the clk and Tegra trees.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature