Re: [PATCH 10/21] tracing/probe: Split trace_event related data from trace_probe

[Masami Hiramatsu]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:11:15 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:23:22 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Oops, good catch!
> > > This part is related to caller (ftrace/perf) so should be more careful.
> > > Usually, kprobe enablement should not fail. If one of them has
> > > gone (like a probe on unloaded module), it can be fail but that
> > > should be ignored. I would like to add some additional check so that
> > > - If all kprobes are on the module which is unloaded, enablement
> > >   must be failed and return error.
> > > - If any kprobe is enabled, and others are on non-exist modules,
> > >   it should succeeded and return OK.
> > > - If any kprobe caused an error not because of unloaded module,
> > >   all other enablement should be canceled and return error.
> > > 
> > > Is that OK for you?
> > >   
> > 
> > Sounds good to me.
> 
> BTW,
> 
> I pulled in patches 1-9 and I'm starting to test them now.

Thanks! Should I send 10-21 patches in v2?

Thank you,




-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>