Re: [PATCH v5 08/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor bus protection control
From: Weiyi Lu
Date: Wed Jun 19 2019 - 05:36:34 EST
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 20:09 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Put bus protection enable and disable control in separate functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > index 65b734b40098..6bf846cb1893 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > @@ -279,6 +279,34 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
> > MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> > }
> >
> > +static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> > +{
> > + struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> > + ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> > + scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> > + scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
>
> Maybe other people have different opinions, but I prefer:
>
> if (!scpd->data->bus_prot_mask)
> return 0;
>
> return mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(...);
>
ok, I'll update in next version.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> > +{
> > + struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> > + ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> > + scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> > + scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> > {
> > struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
> > @@ -321,13 +349,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > goto err_pwr_ack;
> >
> > - if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> > - ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> > - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> > - scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto err_pwr_ack;
> > - }
> > + ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(scpd);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto err_pwr_ack;
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > @@ -349,13 +373,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> > u32 val;
> > int ret, tmp;
> >
> > - if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> > - ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> > - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> > - scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > + ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(scpd);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
> >
> > ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek