Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

[Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant]

> On 19 Jun 2019, at 15:13, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> I've fixed this as follows, thanks:
> 
> ====================
> From 23cdf8752b26d4edbd60a6293bca492d83192d4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:12:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] act_ctinfo: Don't use BIT() in UAPI headers.
> 
> Use _BITUL() instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h
> index da803e05a89b..32337304fbe5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ enum {
> #define TCA_CTINFO_MAX (__TCA_CTINFO_MAX - 1)
> 
> enum {
> -	CTINFO_MODE_DSCP	= BIT(0),
> -	CTINFO_MODE_CPMARK	= BIT(1)
> +	CTINFO_MODE_DSCP	= _BITUL(0),
> +	CTINFO_MODE_CPMARK	= _BITUL(1)
> };
> 
> #endif
> --
> 2.20.1
> 

Hi David,

Thanks for that.  Owe you a beer!

Thinking out loud, doesnât this also require:

#include <linux/const.h>


Or at least iproute2 would need to know about _BITUL as it doesnât at present.
Which also means iproute2âs Linux uapi shadow would also have to import
linux/const.h.  Or have I got wrong end of stick?

Cheers,

Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP