[PATCH v6 07/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor sram control

From: Weiyi Lu
Date: Wed Jun 19 2019 - 22:43:54 EST


Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 5b73e4e..58627ab 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -230,12 +230,55 @@ static int scpsys_clk_enable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
return ret;
}

+static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+ int tmp;
+
+ val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+ writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+ /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
+ if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
+ /*
+ * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
+ * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup
+ * is applied here.
+ */
+ usleep_range(12000, 12100);
+ } else {
+ /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+ int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+ (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
+ MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+ int tmp;
+
+ val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+ writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+ /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+ return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+ (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
+ MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
- u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
u32 val;
int ret, tmp;

@@ -247,6 +290,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
if (ret)
goto err_clk;

+ /* subsys power on */
val = readl(ctl_addr);
val |= PWR_ON_BIT;
writel(val, ctl_addr);
@@ -268,24 +312,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT;
writel(val, ctl_addr);

- val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
- writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
- /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
- if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
- /*
- * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
- * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is
- * applied here.
- */
- usleep_range(12000, 12100);
-
- } else {
- ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
- MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto err_pwr_ack;
- }
+ ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_pwr_ack;

if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
@@ -312,7 +341,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
- u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
u32 val;
int ret, tmp;

@@ -324,17 +352,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
goto out;
}

- val = readl(ctl_addr);
- val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
- writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
- /* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */
- ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
- MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+ ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;

- val |= PWR_ISO_BIT;
+ /* subsys power off */
+ val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT;
writel(val, ctl_addr);

val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT;
--
1.8.1.1.dirty