RE: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too

[Steve Twiss]

Hi Wolfram,

On 20 June 2019 10:21, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too
> 
> > Is this a safety clause? What I mean is, shouldn't the hardware design make
> > sure there are not two devices located on the same I2C bus with the same slave
> > address?
> 
> It is more about preventing userspace to accidently access this address,
> and thus the registers behind it.

For what it's worth, maybe consider adding a dev_warn attached to the return
of devm_i2c_new_dummy_device?

Regards,
Steve

My apologies again for accidentally splitting your original e-mail thread on this:
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171806.30116-1-wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/