Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] NVIDIA Tegra devfreq improvements and Tegra20/30 support

[Dmitry Osipenko]

24.06.2019 2:50, Chanwoo Choi ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 19. 6. 24. ìì 2:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 05.06.2019 2:09, Dmitry Osipenko ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>> 04.06.2019 3:49, Chanwoo Choi ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>>> On 19. 6. 4. ìì 1:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> 03.05.2019 3:52, Dmitry Osipenko ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>>>>> 03.05.2019 3:31, Chanwoo Choi ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19. 5. 2. ìì 8:37, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v4: Addressed all review comments that were made by Chanwoo Choi to v3:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     - changed the driver removal order to match the probe exactly
>>>>>>>>     - added clarifying comment for 1/8 ratio to the Tegra20 driver
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Chanwoo, please also note that the clk patch that should fix
>>>>>>>>     compilation problem that was reported the kbuild-test-robot is already
>>>>>>>>     applied and available in the recent linux-next.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I knew that Stephen picked up your path about clock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, good. Thank you very much for reviewing this series! I assume it's
>>>>>> too late now for v5.2, but it should be good to go for v5.3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Chanwoo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Will be nice to see the patches in the linux-next before they'll hit mainline. We have tested that
>>>>> everything works fine on a selective devices, but won't hurt to get some extra testing beforehand.
>>>>> AFAIK, at least NVIDIA people are regularly testing -next on theirs dev boards. Please note that
>>>>> this not very important, so don't bother if there is some hurdle with pushing to the tracking branch
>>>>> for now. Also please let me know if you're expecting to see some ACK's on the patches, I'm sure
>>>>> we'll be able to work out that with Thierry and Jon if necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>> I think that it is enough for applying to mainline branch.
>>>> The devfreq.git is maintained by Myungjoo. He will be merged or
>>>> reviewed if there are th remained review point.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Myungjoo,
>>>> I reviewed the Dmitry's patches from v1 to v4 patches.
>>>> And then I tested them on my testing branch[1] for catching
>>>> the build warning and error. In result, it is clean.
>>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing
>>>>
>>>> Please review or apply these patches for v5.3.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Myungjoo,
>>>
>>> I think this patchset should be completed now. Thierry has some extra
>>> comments to the patches, but seems nothing critical so far and all the
>>> concerns could be addressed in a follow-up series. Please let me know if
>>> you're fine with this, I can re-spin v5 as well if necessary.
>>>
>>
>> Hello Chanwoo,
>>
>> It looks like Myungjoo is inactive at the moment. Do you know if he'll
>> be back to the time of the merge window opening or you'll be curating
>> the pull request for 5.3 this time?
> 
> Myungoo works in the same place. I'll talk with him.
> 
>>
>> Secondly, I'll send a few more patches on top of this series, addressing
>> Thierry's comments and making more improvements. Please let me know if
>> this causes any problems and I should re-spin the whole series.
> 
> OK. I'll review them.

Thank you!