Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:53 AM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
> > is trying to avoid.
> >
> > Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> what about this one?

Care to respond to my question regarding this one in the first place, please?