Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro

[Viresh Kumar]

On 24-06-19, 10:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Hi Viresh,
> 
> On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
> > is trying to avoid.
> > 
> > Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> what about this one?

I didn't say something because Rafael already pointed out something
which he wanted. Actually he was the one who suggested it to Amit
initially.

http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJZ5v0huESFqOADqyym-ci-XcWpL4tbcd9a-jxe_KArXKpHFyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
viresh